AlmaLinux vs Proxmox VE
AlmaLinux and Proxmox VE compared on the facts that matter: release model, desktop, package management, init system, memory floor and installation size.
Side by side
| AlmaLinux | Proxmox VE | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | rpm | deb |
| Release model | Versioned releases | Versioned releases |
| Desktop | GNOME | Web interface |
| Package manager | DNF (RPM) | APT (dpkg) |
| Init system | systemd | systemd |
| Immutable root | No | No |
| Wayland by default | Yes | N-a |
| Minimum RAM | 1.5 GB | 1 GB |
| ISO size | 1.5 GB | 1.6 GB |
| Latest kernel | — | — |
| Releases archived | 20 | 12 |
| Latest release | — | 21 May 2026 |
What differs
Package manager
AlmaLinux ships DNF (RPM); Proxmox VE ships APT (dpkg).
Minimum RAM
Proxmox VE runs on less memory: 1024 MB against 1536 MB.
Shared traits
Both systems share more than they differ: the table above lines up the current facts side by side.
Verdict
Both are solid choices for their goals — the practical differences are in the table and the points above. Full range tables for each are on their distro pages.
{$AFFBLOCK}FAQ
Which one is easier for beginners?
Check the installer row and minimum RAM: a graphical installer with a low memory floor is the friendlier first step.
Where do the numbers come from?
From the current release snapshots of each distribution archived by the linux2u.ru team.