MX Linux vs Slackware Linux
MX Linux and Slackware Linux compared on the facts that matter: release model, desktop, package management, init system, memory floor and installation size.
Side by side
| MX Linux | Slackware Linux | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Debian family | Independent |
| Release model | Versioned releases | Versioned releases |
| Desktop | Xfce (AHS option) | KDE Plasma 5 (15.0) |
| Package manager | APT (dpkg) + MX Installer | slackpkg (pkgtools) |
| Init system | sysVinit (systemd optional) | SysVinit (BSD-style scripts) |
| Immutable root | Yes | Yes |
| Wayland by default | No | No |
| Minimum RAM | 512 MB | 1 GB |
| ISO size | 2.1 GB | 4.1 GB |
| Latest kernel | 6.1 | 5.15 |
| Releases archived | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2025 | 2022 |
What differs
Init system
MX Linux boots with sysVinit (systemd optional); Slackware Linux uses SysVinit (BSD-style scripts).
Package manager
MX Linux ships APT (dpkg) + MX Installer; Slackware Linux ships slackpkg (pkgtools).
Minimum RAM
MX Linux runs on less memory: 512 MB against 1024 MB.
Verdict
Both are solid choices for their goals — the practical differences are in the table and the points above. Full range tables for each are on their distro pages.
{$AFFBLOCK}FAQ
Which one is easier for beginners?
Check the installer row and minimum RAM: a graphical installer with a low memory floor is the friendlier first step.
Where do the numbers come from?
From the current release snapshots of each distribution archived by the linux2u.ru team.