MX Linux vs Pop!_OS
MX Linux and Pop!_OS compared on the facts that matter: release model, desktop, package management, init system, memory floor and installation size.
Side by side
| MX Linux | Pop!_OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Debian family | deb |
| Release model | Versioned releases | Versioned releases |
| Desktop | Xfce (AHS option) | GNOME |
| Package manager | APT (dpkg) + MX Installer | APT (dpkg) + Pop!_Shop |
| Init system | sysVinit (systemd optional) | systemd |
| Immutable root | Yes | No |
| Wayland by default | No | Yes |
| Minimum RAM | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| ISO size | 2.1 GB | 2.8 GB |
| Latest kernel | 6.1 | 6.18.2 |
| Releases archived | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2025 | 11 December 2025 |
What differs
Init system
MX Linux boots with sysVinit (systemd optional); Pop!_OS uses systemd.
Package manager
MX Linux ships APT (dpkg) + MX Installer; Pop!_OS ships APT (dpkg) + Pop!_Shop.
Minimum RAM
MX Linux runs on less memory: 512 MB against 4096 MB.
Verdict
Both are solid choices for their goals — the practical differences are in the table and the points above. Full range tables for each are on their distro pages.
{$AFFBLOCK}FAQ
Which one is easier for beginners?
Check the installer row and minimum RAM: a graphical installer with a low memory floor is the friendlier first step.
Where do the numbers come from?
From the current release snapshots of each distribution archived by the linux2u.ru team.