Garuda Linux vs Manjaro Linux
Garuda Linux and Manjaro Linux compared on the facts that matter: release model, desktop, package management, init system, memory floor and installation size.
Side by side
| Garuda Linux | Manjaro Linux | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Arch family | arch |
| Release model | Rolling release | Rolling release |
| Desktop | KDE Plasma (Dragonized) / multi-DE | Xfce |
| Package manager | pacman | pacman + Pamac (GTK) |
| Init system | systemd | systemd |
| Immutable root | Yes | No |
| Wayland by default | Yes | Mixed |
| Minimum RAM | 4 GB | — |
| ISO size | 4.9 GB | 5.2 GB |
| Latest kernel | 6.12 | 7.1 |
| Releases archived | 0 | 38 |
| Latest release | 2026 (rolling) | 12 August 2026 |
What differs
Package manager
Garuda Linux ships pacman; Manjaro Linux ships pacman + Pamac (GTK).
Shared traits
Both systems share more than they differ: the table above lines up the current facts side by side.
Verdict
Both are solid choices for their goals — the practical differences are in the table and the points above. Full range tables for each are on their distro pages.
{$AFFBLOCK}FAQ
Which one is easier for beginners?
Check the installer row and minimum RAM: a graphical installer with a low memory floor is the friendlier first step.
Where do the numbers come from?
From the current release snapshots of each distribution archived by the linux2u.ru team.