EndeavourOS vs Pop!_OS
EndeavourOS and Pop!_OS compared on the facts that matter: release model, desktop, package management, init system, memory floor and installation size.
Side by side
| EndeavourOS | Pop!_OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Family | Arch family | deb |
| Release model | Rolling release | Versioned releases |
| Desktop | KDE Plasma (offline) / choice | GNOME |
| Package manager | pacman | APT (dpkg) + Pop!_Shop |
| Init system | systemd | systemd |
| Immutable root | Yes | No |
| Wayland by default | Yes | Yes |
| Minimum RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| ISO size | 2.7 GB | 2.8 GB |
| Latest kernel | 6.12 | 6.18.2 |
| Releases archived | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026 (rolling) | 11 December 2025 |
What differs
Release model
EndeavourOS uses rolling releases, while Pop!_OS uses versioned releases.
Package manager
EndeavourOS ships pacman; Pop!_OS ships APT (dpkg) + Pop!_Shop.
Minimum RAM
EndeavourOS runs on less memory: 2048 MB against 4096 MB.
Verdict
Both are solid choices for their goals — the practical differences are in the table and the points above. Full range tables for each are on their distro pages.
{$AFFBLOCK}FAQ
Which one is easier for beginners?
Check the installer row and minimum RAM: a graphical installer with a low memory floor is the friendlier first step.
Where do the numbers come from?
From the current release snapshots of each distribution archived by the linux2u.ru team.